What is already known:
What this study adds:
Abstract:
Severe weather is challenging to predict but even more so to prepare for. County Emergency Managers (EMs) and other local officials are tasked with the dilemma regularly of being fiscally prudent yet always prepared. Tabletop exercises were conducted in northern California to better understand whether two experimental graphics could better support the difficult decisions being made. First, background interviews were conducted with EMs in two counties before the exercises to better understand local concerns and their decision-making process. All interactions with participants were recorded and transcribed by a professional transcription company. Special attention was given during the analysis regarding the two probabilistic graphics: a box-and-whisker graph and a stacked bar graph. They contained similar information but displayed it in different ways. Because the tabletop exercises had many participants, an anonymous online survey about the two graphics helped ensure everyone could provide their input. Surveys and tabletop discussions were analyzed to better understand how EMs and other local officials use weather forecasts. In particular, how understandable the probabilistic graphics were and whether they would be used prior to a potential flooding event. The results show that both graphs are helpful in the decision-making process. Still, timing and adequate forecasters' input would need to be provided to EMs and other local officials to optimize their usability.